As is no doubt clear, the desire to post regularly vies with the priorities of the rest of our lives. Hopefully we will manage a fairly regular discourse until we get to Summer, when our schedules might become a little more free.
However, my thoughts are never far from the issues we would like to address and discuss here, and positing a good question and allowing it to brew can often be more worthwhile than opining with frequent regularity (notice my subtle attempt to paint our infrequent posts as a clever exercise in restraint).
On that note, I offer the next subject for our joint review: to express, as best we can, the meaning of the inalienable rights and what the government should look like to best promote and protect those rights. Rather than try to envelope all three into one post, lets take it one issue at a time (although it will likely become apparent that these right are, apart from inalienable, somewhat co-dependant and support one another); let us begin with the Right to Life. What is it? How should the government establish and defend it? Who is qualified to appreciate it? Are there circumstances in which the government could (and possibly should) have the ability to take it away? ‘