President Obama has poured billions of tax dollars into a government take-over of the Auto Industry. Fair Enough. He is pushing through a Socialist agenda for a national healthcare system, which will effectively strip us of our options with regard to our medical care, while simultaneously creating a shortage for the care available. Que Sera, Sera. He has nominated for the Supreme Court a Justice who is clearly a racist, but being a person of color is not called to account for her evil views. Such is life.
As disastrous as I believe President Obama’s domestic policy to be, it pales when compared to his foreign policy with regard to the “elections” in Iran; a foreign policy that would be generously described as tepid, insincere, passionless, or even disinterested.
Let me be clear: with regard to the sham elections and the violent fallout that has arisen as a result, the position of the Leader of the Free World should be a full-throated denouncing of the criminal tactics of Ahmadenijad and his ilk, and unwavering support of the protestors and a call for outside, neutral investigations and recount.
Perhaps President Obama is simply nervous about inserting the full power of the US government into delicate and difficult circumstances. Still, he has felt no compunction about telling Israel how it should handle the delicate situation in Gaza. As we are some of Israel’s last allies, a scolding from our Commander-in-Chief is hardly the kind of support a nation under almost constant terrorist attack needs. And his domestic policy would certainly suggest that there is little he believes the US government is unable to fix. But that is for another post.
Yet for all of this, somehow the best we can manage when the democratic process is ignored in a state already on the edge of an international confrontation for its nuclear program, combined with its rampant anti-Semitism, and it’s support of multiple terrorist organizations, is this, “It is not productive, given the history of US and Iranian relations to be seen as meddling in Iranian elections.”
It remains unclear how stating that injustice is being done to an entire populace is “meddling” and apparently even President Obama’s own administration finds his inarticulate defense of free and fair elections to be less than appropriate. While I recognize that care is necessary when dealing with the internal politics of any other nation, especially a nation such as Iran, I think it is ridiculous that any President would feel the need to tip-toe around publically denouncing the killing of political protestors, or the violent repression of a free election. It is not redundant to state publically what we are for, and what we oppose, especially in a case such as this. For the people of Iran, the powers that be all seem to have conspired against them; why should we flinch from demonstrating how different we are?
Perhaps we could forgive Mr. Obama; after all, this is only the second time in less than a year that the cause of freedom and liberty have been challenged while he had access to the largest microphone in the civilized world. Or, perhaps the President is simply not comfortable being the spokesman for Freedom, Justice, and Liberty. One begins to wonder exactly which basic principles of our society, if any, he is comfortable promoting. ‘